Cubic zirconia and diamonds may look very similar, but the similarities stop there. There are huge differences between these two materials, and choosing between them can be a pretty important decision! Let’s look at some of the differences, and at which one is the best option for you.
The main reason that people turn to cubic zirconia engagement rings is the difference in price. While diamonds are one of the priciest gemstones out there, cubic zirconia jewelry is very affordable. Large, near perfect quality cubic zirconia stones are available at under $100, while a similar diamond could cost upwards of $5,000.
Although price leads many people to look at cubic zirconia, the hardness, durability, and strength of diamonds is a reason why many people ultimately choose to pay the money for them. Diamond is known as one of the hardest materials on earth. Cubic zirconia is weaker and more prone to scratches and damages. Although a cubic zirconia ring, properly taken care of, will last for years, a diamond engagement ring will last for generations.
Finally, you should consider how traditional you want your ring to be. Many people won’t even consider anything other than a diamond, because of the tradition and symbolism attached to having this gemstone in your engagement ring. While cubic zirconia may look very similar and cost a lot less, it’s not uncommon to feel that it is just a cheap substitute for diamond. For something as rich with meaning and symbolism as an engagement ring, you may find that cubic zirconia just doesn’t cut it.
Cubic zirconia engagement rings offer you a lot of style options, at very affordable prices. From elaborate engagement rings, to replica antique engagement rings, you can get gorgeous looks in cubic zirconia. However, it doesn’t have the same hardness as diamonds, and some people feel that the symbolism of diamond is too important. Ultimately, the decision depends on your budget, tastes, and preferences.